Evaluation and projection of 4G and 5G RAN energy footprints: the case of Belgium for 2020–2025

Status:: 🟩
Links::

Metadata

Authors:: Golard, Louis; Louveaux, JΓ©rΓ΄me; Bol, David
Title:: Evaluation and projection of 4G and 5G RAN energy footprints: the case of Belgium for 2020–2025
Publication Title:: "Annals of Telecommunications"
Date:: 2023
URL:: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12243-022-00932-9
DOI:: 10.1007/s12243-022-00932-9

Notes & Annotations

Color-coded highlighting system used for annotations

πŸ“‘ Annotations (imported on 2024-01-31#17:29:27)

golard.etal.2023.evaluationprojection4g5granenergyfootprints (pg. 1)

The infrastructure supporting mobile communications can be divided into four segments: (i) the end-user devices, (ii) the radio access network (RAN), (iii) the core network, and (iv) the data centers.

golard.etal.2023.evaluationprojection4g5granenergyfootprints (pg. 10)

The energy intensity per GB is shown in Fig. 7c for 4G and 5G independently, and for both generations together. Clearly, the energy intensity of 5G is 3 to 5Γ— lower compared to 4G, and up to 8 to 12Γ— better with SM. Without 5G deployment, the energy intensity of 4G is 0.15 kWh/GB in 2025, which is 2Γ— lower than in 2020 because the additional traffic requires few more dynamic power, and no more static power.

golard.etal.2023.evaluationprojection4g5granenergyfootprints (pg. 11)

The carbon footprint of RANs consists of embodied and operating GHG emissions. The operating carbon footprint is estimated using the carbon intensity of electricity consumed in Belgium, i.e., 0.230 kgCO2e/kWh in 2019 [54]. Assuming a reduction rate of 3% per year as observed in historical trends [34], the power carbon intensity is projected to be 0.223 kgCO2e/kWh in 2020, and 0.192 kgCO2e/kWh in 2025.

golard.etal.2023.evaluationprojection4g5granenergyfootprints (pg. 13)

The average carbon intensity of mobile data transfers is estimated to be 0.10 kgCO2/GB in 2020 and around 0.05 kgCO2/GB in 2025 for scenarios keeping 4G active, even with SM in 5G. Again, a rebound effect appears for the carbon footprint. Per user, the average carbon intensity remains between 4 and 6 kgCO2e/user for all scenarios. The amortization of 4G BSs reduces GHG emission savings.

golard.etal.2023.evaluationprojection4g5granenergyfootprints (pg. 13)

Results show that the RAN energy consumption is mostly independent of the data traffic because BSs are lightly loaded on average.

golard.etal.2023.evaluationprojection4g5granenergyfootprints (pg. 13)

With full 5G deployment, we rather predict a threefold growth in mobile data traffic and an 81% increase in total energy consumption, despite the improvement in energy intensity. This illustrates a backfire rebound effect.

golard.etal.2023.evaluationprojection4g5granenergyfootprints (pg. 13)

The sleep mode feature can reduce the static energy consumption of 5G, improving up to 10 times its energy efficiency compared to 4G.

golard.etal.2023.evaluationprojection4g5granenergyfootprints (pg. 13)

Accurately assessing environmental impacts of 4G and 5G BSs throughout their life-cycle is difficult because there is currently a lack of data and information from manufacturers. Hence, we roughly estimate embodied and operating GHG emissions of BSs, and we observe a clear upward trend of RAN carbon footprint when 5G deployment is extensive. This is partly due to the large number of new 5G BSs that need to be produced. Depending on the scenario, embodied GHG emissions account for 40 to 70% of the total carbon footprint, which is significant and should be included in mobile network deployment strategies.